Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:09
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Women like what they hear while men like what they see, it that true?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What types of cushioning does Nike use in their running shoes?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
NASA Pulls the Plug on Europa Lander, but Scientists Propose a Plan B - Gizmodo
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
How did you become popular in school?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
To Break a Bad Habit and Create a New One, Neuroscience Says Just Make One Simple Change - Inc.com
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump travel ban barring citizens from 12 countries takes effect - BBC
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Aubrey Anderson-Emmons cleverly comes out as bi with help from this 'Modern Family' scene - Yahoo
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.